Community Science: Local Action for Resilience and Research
Water quality impacts from human activity are predicted to worsen as anthropogenic climate change continues. Unfortunately, the agencies and research institutions tasked with managing these issues have limited resources that curtail the scope of water quality monitoring conducted across the Basin. The results are stark gaps in available water quality data, a persistent barrier to the early warnings and investments needed to ensure short and long-term community resilience across the region. Fortunately, Great Lakes residents feel a powerful sense of connection to their water resources. Local organizations have been harnessing this energy to power “Citizen,” "Community," or “Volunteer” science groups that monitor water quality across the Basin for years. Dozens of groups regularly sample creeks, rivers, and shorelines across the Great Lakes region to support local water resource management. Volunteer science has immense potential to deepen our capacity to protect our water resources. However, lack of standardized data collection methods as well as limited organizational visibility have often meant that volunteer-collected data is not adequately considered in water governance, management, planning, research, and advocacy conversations at multiple scales. Despite these challenges, volunteer groups are finding ways use their data to drive community resilience to water quality challenges and drive local stewardship and enjoyment of our Great Lakes. Some groups are leveraging technology to improve the credibility and usability of their data. Others are organizing regional collaborations to share best practices and pursue greater collective impact. This session will focus on highlighting these success stories of Community Science in Action. Chaired by:Max Herzog, Cleveland Water AllianceGabrielle Parent-Doliner, Water Rangers
Domestic Action Plans for Lake Erie: Supporting Action, Progress, and Knowledge Sharing
The Lake Erie States Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana and the Province of Ontario, in partnership with their federal governments, developed domestic action plans (DAPs) in 2018 to meet binational phosphorus load reduction targets for Lake Erie, outlining significant on the ground actions across the basin to reduce harmful algal blooms, hypoxia and nuisance algae. Robust binational science and extensive collaboration are the pillars of the DAPs. This session brings together practitioners, researchers and knowledge bearers to share the latest science and incorporate traditional knowledge and management insights to support actions that can effectively reduce phosphorous loads to Lake Erie. We welcome abstract submissions about interconnected dimensions related to the health of ecosystems and communities. Session sub-topics may include:1. Synthesis of the science, models and innovative approaches for DAP implementation.2. Research linking source reduction actions in rural and urban communities to phosphorus load reductions and handling uncertainty through adaptive management.3. Indicators or metrics (new or revised) to track phosphorus load reduction progress in the tributary streams, watershed, and lake.4. Outreach and engagement for DAP implementation, and knowledge sharing with the Lake Erie basin community, including disadvantaged communities.5. Strengthening DAP inclusivity, including diverse communities and traditional ways of knowing. We will invite a panel of diverse voices to hear about policy and science supporting DAP actions, share their knowledge and experiences, and the session will close with a panel discussion about how the resource management community can improve knowledge sharing under the DAPs. Chaired by:Sandra Kosek-Sills, Ohio Lake Erie CommissionMichelle Selzer, Michigan Dept. of Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentKristen Arnold, Indiana Dept of Environmental ManagementNgan Diep, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Physical Processes in Lakes, Part II of II
This session’s focus is on the physical limnology of the Great Lakes and other lakes of the world. Papers are solicited dealing with field, modeling, experimental and laboratory studies of physical processes in lakes and coastal regions (surface waves, internal waves, currents, turbulence, stratification, ice, sediment transport, etc.) ranging in sizes from small, to medium and large. Chaired by:Jason Olsthoorn, Queens UniversityMathew G Wells, University of Toronto David J Cannon, Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes ResearchYi Hong, Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research
The Role of Microbial Processes in the Assessment of the Great Lakes Ecosystem Health
The Great Lakes- the world's largest freshwater system- play a vital role in supporting the diverse ecosystems and services relied on by the human populations lining it’s shorelines. They are the lifeblood of our society, providing recreational and drinking water resources, and represent a fundamental resource deserving of our collective stewardship through a One Health lens. These precious water bodies face unprecedented anthropogenic challenges, notably due to climate change, changes in land-use, pollution from wastewater, agricultural runoffs, and antibiotic residues, and ultimately eutrophication. Even though microbial communities are fundamental players of biogeochemical transformations, their roles in aquatic processes are often the missing piece to be able to understand and predict how aquatic ecosystems will respond to disturbances. For instance, microbes are involved in the occurrence of harmful algae blooms via nutrients cycling, in carbon budget through synthesis and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions, sediment biogeochemical/redox cycling and in a human health lens due to the fate and transport of pathogens (including those harboring antimicrobial resistance) all of which collectively impact the Great Lakes ecosystem health. Therefore, a better understanding and investigation of the role of microbial communities in ecosystem processes are key to bridging the different compartments of the ‘one health’ concept. We invite contributors who work on any aspect of microbial processes to assess ecosystem health in the Great Lakes. We want to foster interdisciplinary discussions and encourage collaborations between researchers, local communities, policymakers, and practitioners. Chaired by:Sophie Crevecoeur, Environment and Climate Change Canada Thomas Reid, Environment and Climate Change Canada
Water Quality, Ecosystem Services, and Beneficial Uses of Great Lakes Connecting Waters
This session will highlight interjurisdictional and multi-disciplinary approaches to research and management of natural resources in Great Lakes connecting waters. Presentations and subsequent publication in a special issue of the Journal of Great Lakes Research will provide the scientific community with updates on status and concerns of water quality, contaminants, foodwebs, fish populations, and habitats. Presentations will emphasize connecting waters of the Great Lakes including the St. Marys River between lakes Superior and Huron, Straits of Mackinac between lakes Michigan and Huron, St. Clair-Detroit River System including the St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, and the Detroit River connecting Lake Huron and Lake Erie, the Niagara River between lakes Erie and Ontario, and the St. Lawrence River connecting Lake Ontario to the Atlantic Ocean. Historically, these systems possessed pristine water quality and resources that supported Indigenous Nations communities and offered numerous archipelagoes, reefs, embayments, wetlands, and tributaries that provided vast amounts of functional habitat for fish and wildlife. The riparian lands adjacent to these channels were desirable to European settlers who required water for transportation and industry, which over time, resulted in degraded water quality and habitat due to development, urbanization, industry and associated pollutants, barriers and flow regulation, and channel modification. Healthy relationships with resources in connecting waters involves interjurisdictional cooperation and collaboration. This session will highlight the research and management activities related to restoration successes and provide suggestions for continued recovery efforts. Chaired by: Edward F Roseman, US Geological Survey Great Lakes Science CenterRobin L DeBruyne, US Geological Survey Great Lakes Science CenterKatie Stammler, Essex Region Conservation AuthorityMichael Twiss, Algoma University